40Radiotherapy dose fractionation Third edition
6.
Head and neck cancer
Background
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the accepted standard radiotherapy for
patients undergoing primary and adjuvant radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell
carcinomas; exceptions are T1/T2N0 glottic cancer and the use of low-dose palliative
radiotherapy. The international standard for denitive treatment remains 70 Gray (Gy) in
daily fractions of 2 Gy over seven weeks, although altered fractionation regimens have been
widely used. In the UK, many centres have adopted 65–66 Gy in 30 fractions over six weeks
as a standard regimen. Most centres employ a simultaneous integrated boost technique
with IMRT to treat all target volumes and elective lymph node regions to varying dose levels
in each fraction (rather than the use of multiple phases or a matched neck eld). This has
led to altered fractionation regimens for either high-dose or elective treatment volumes.
1
T1/2N0 glottic carcinoma
Hypofractionated regimens are recommended.
2
A randomised trial demonstrated the
superiority of modest hypofractionation with 2.25 Gy per fraction and, in large retrospective
series, fraction sizes of ≥2.25 Gy compared favourably with other reported series.
2–4
Several
UK series have reported high rates of local control with shorter more hypofractionated
schedules including 50–52.5 Gy in 16 fractions over three weeks for T1 disease and 55 Gy
in 20 fractions for T1 and T2 disease.
5–8
Hyperfractionated schedules have not shown a
signicant improvement compared with conventional fractionation.
9
Recommendations
63 Gy in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks (Grade B)
50 Gy in 16 fractions over 3 weeks (T1 disease only) (Grade C)
55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks (Grade C)
The types of evidence and the grading of recommendations used within this review are based on
those proposed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based medicine.
10
Role of modied fractionation in head and neck squamous cell
carcinoma (HNSCC) (non-nasopharyngeal)
A meta-analysis of 15 trials of altered fractionation without chemotherapy in non-
nasopharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (predominantly oropharynx
and larynx cancers) showed a modest benet in overall survival (3.4% at ve years)
and local control (6.4% at ve years).
11
The overall survival benet was mainly seen
with hyperfractionation (8.2% at ve years) although these schedules are dicult to
implement and are not widely used (Level 1a).
10
The Danish Head and Neck Cancer
Group (DAHANCA) regimen of six fractions per week showed an improvement of 10% in
ve-year locoregional control in patients treated without chemotherapy with transiently
increased acute toxicity.
12
In the meta-analysis the overall survival benet of acceleration
without a total dose reduction was 2% at ve years, and 1.7% at ve years with a total dose
reduction.
11
There was no benet of altered fractionation for patients age >70 years old
(Level 1b).
10,11
41Radiotherapy dose fractionation Third edition
Elective lymph node and mucosal doses with IMRT
A biological equivalent dose (EQD2) of 50 Gy in 25 fractions is a standard dose to electively
treat lymph node regions. Although there is no direct evidence of the need for higher doses
for microscopic disease, some centres favour the use of an additional ‘intermediate’ risk
higher elective dose, such as a biological equivalent to 60 Gy in 30 fractions, to regions
deemed to be at higher risk of harbouring disease, particularly radiologically equivocal
areas for nodal disease (Level 4).
10,13
In the management of head and neck carcinomas of unknown primary, commonly used
mucosal doses are the biological equivalent of 50–60 Gy in 25–30 fractions.
14–17
Several
series have suggested that doses at the lower end of this dose range are associated with
very low rates of subsequent emergence of a mucosal primary (Level 4).
10,15–17
To incorporate elective lymph node and mucosal doses into a single phase IMRT plan, two
approaches to dose fractionation can be adopted: i) accept moderate hypofractionation to
sites of known disease while retaining a conventional fraction size (1.8–2 Gy) for elective
lymph node treatment or ii) retain a conventional fraction size to known disease and deliver
a reduced fraction size to the elective lymph node regions (for example, 1.5–1.6 Gy). An
increasing number of series suggest that elective lymph node irradiation may be safely
delivered with a reduced fraction size (Level 4).
11,18
Recommendations
For elective nodal treatment using IMRT with a matched lower neck technique:
50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks to the matched neck (Grade C)
Elective treatment within the IMRT plan, the following dose levels
areappropriate:
54 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks (Grade C)
56–57 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (Grade C)
60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks or 63 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks may be
additionally used for ‘intermediate’ risk regions (Grade D)
The types of evidence and the grading of recommendations used within this review are based on
those proposed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based medicine.
10
Radiotherapy alone for early stage (I/II) oropharynx/hypopharnx/larynx
cancer (excluding T1/2 glottic carcinoma)
Single modality treatment with surgery or radiotherapy is the standard of care. The relative
merits of conventional versus altered fractionation remain unclear. IMRT with modest
acceleration has shown high rates of local control with low rates of late toxicity.
19
Patients
with early stage disease accounted for >50% of patients in the DAHANCA 6 and 7 trial
which demonstrated a substantial benet of shortening overall treatment time without
reduction in total dose (66–68 Gy in 33–34 fractions delivered at ve versus six fractions
per week).
12
In a meta-analysis, there was no clear benet for altered fractionation for the
subgroup with stage I/II disease (Level 1a).
10,11
42Radiotherapy dose fractionation Third edition
Recommendations
Stage I/II oropharynx, hypopharynx or non-glottic larynx cancer:
70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (Grade C)
65–66 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks (Grade C)
66 Gy in 33 fractions or 70 Gy in 35 fractions, 6 fractions per week over 6 weeks (Grade B)
The types of evidence and the grading of recommendations used within this review are based on
those proposed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based medicine.
10
Radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy for stage III/IVa/b
HNSCC (excluding nasopharyngeal carcinoma)
Radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin is the current standard of care for the denitive
management of stage III/IV patients <70 years of age with adequate performance
status.
20
The international standard schedule is 70 Gy in 35 fractions.
20
Although not
directly compared, a modestly hypofractionated schedule of 65–66 Gy in 30 fractions
has been adopted as standard practice in a number of UK trials and centres.
21
There has
been considerable interest in combining perceived benets of altered fractionation with
concurrent chemotherapy. However, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)
0129 trial compared 72 Gy in 42 fractions delivered over six weeks with two cycles of
concurrent chemotherapy with a standard arm of 70 Gy in 35 fractions over seven weeks
with three cycles of concurrent chemotherapy with no dierence seen between the arms.
22
The three arm Groupe d’Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête et Cou (GORTEC) 99-02 phase
III trial compared 70 Gy in 35 fractions over seven weeks with three cycles of concurrent
chemotherapy with 70 Gy over six weeks with two cycles of concurrent chemotherapy and
a very accelerated radiotherapy alone arm of 64.8 Gy in 3.5 weeks; there was no benet of
modest acceleration with concurrent chemotherapy while the accelerated radiotherapy
alone arm was inferior (Level 1b).
10,23
These data support a hypothesis that concurrent
cisplatin may suppress tumour repopulation during radiotherapy, leading to a lower than
expected tumour biologically equivalent dose with modestly accelerated schedules.
24
Reported outcomes for hypofractionated IMRT schedules with concomitant chemotherapy
(65 Gy in 30 fractions over six weeks or 55 Gy in 20 fractions over four weeks) do not as yet
support this hypothesis (Level 2b).
10,21,25
In patients with oropharyngeal cancer, the tumour human papilloma virus (HPV) status
has been identied as a strong and independent prognostic factor for survival.
26
In the
anticipation of robust evidence from ongoing de-escalation studies, radiotherapy dose and
fractionation for HPV positive oropharyngeal carcinomas should be no dierent to that for
HPV negative oropharyngeal tumours (Grade D).
10
Recommendations
Radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy:
70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (Grade A)
65–66 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks (Grade C)
The types of evidence and the grading of recommendations used within this review are based on
those proposed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.
10
43Radiotherapy dose fractionation Third edition
Radiotherapy alone for stage III/IVa/b HNSCC (excluding
nasopharyngeal carcinoma)
The meta-analysis does not show a benet of concomitant chemotherapy in patients >70
years old (Level 1a).
10,20
Concomitant chemotherapy or cetuximab may not be appropriate
for some patients <70 years old due to co-morbidity, tness or patient choice. Altered
fractionation is an option for t patients <70 years old treated with radiotherapy alone with
superior local control and no increase in late toxicity; meta-analysis of altered fractionation
studies did not show a benet for alterated fractionation in patients ≥70 years old
(Level1a).
10,11,12,27
Recommendations
Radiotherapy without concomitant radiotherapy:
66 Gy in 33 fractions or 70 Gy in 35 fractions, 6 fractions per week, over 6 weeks (Grade A)
70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (Grade B)
65–66 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks (Grade C)
The types of evidence and the grading of recommendations used within this review are based on
those proposed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.
10
Postoperative radiotherapy
There are few studies of radiation dose with postoperative radiotherapy with or without
chemotherapy. Historical studies suggest that for adjuvant radiotherapy alone, patients
with extracapsular extension benetted from doses of 63 Gy and for other patients there
was no benet >57.6 Gy (Level 2b).
10,28
Adjuvant doses of 60–66 Gy in 30–33 fractions were
used in the RTOG and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer
(EORTC) trials investigating the role of concurrent chemotherapy.
29,30
A pooled analysis
identied subgroups with close/positive margins and/or extracapsular spread as beneting
from concurrent cisplatin (Level 2a).
10,31
Based on limited evidence of a dose-eect in the
adjuvant setting, a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions is considered standard in the presence of
high-risk pathological ndings, and 60 Gy in 30 fractions is widely used in the absence of
high-risk features.
32,33
Doses equivalent to 50–54 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction are commonly used
for lower risk areas at risk of microscopic disease (Level 4).
10,33
Recommendation
Postoperative radiotherapy:
60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks (Grade B)
A dose of up to 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks may be delivered to high-risk
subvolumes (areas surrounding extracapsular spread and/or positive/close margins)
(Grade B)
The types of evidence and the grading of recommendations used within this review are based on
those proposed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.
10
44Radiotherapy dose fractionation Third edition
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Radiotherapy alone is used for early stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
34
For locally
advanced disease, conventionally fractionated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy
is currently recommended. RTOG phase 2 trials have used a high, intermediate and elective
three dose level approach of 70 Gy, 59.4 Gy and 54 Gy in 33 fractions (Level 2b).
10,35
A case
series of altered fractionation using 65 Gy in 30 fractions with an elective dose level of 54 Gy
in 30 fractions has reported disease outcomes and toxicity (Level 4).
10,36
Doses biologically
equivalent to 50–60 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction are commonly used to treat at-risk sites.
34
Recommendations
Nasopharyngeal cancer:
70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (Grade A)
70 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks (Grade B)
65 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks (Grade C)
The types of evidence and the grading of recommendations used within this review are based on
those proposed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.
10
Palliative radiotherapy schedules
Palliative radiotherapy is used in a very heterogenous group of patients, and may range
from the use of a single fraction to stop bleeding/fungation to the use of high doses to
achieve longer-term disease control while accepting that a cure is not possible. Decisions
with regard to palliative radiotherapy dose fractionation take into account symptoms,
disease extent and co-morbidity. When higher doses are delivered, three-dimensional (3D)
conformal radiotherapy or IMRT are often required due to proximity to critical structures.
There is no consensus for palliative radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck
cancer.
37
Recommendations
E
xamples of appropriate dose fractionations include:
40 Gy in 10 fractions over 4 weeks split course’ (Level C)
38
*
24 Gy in 3 fractions over 3 weeks (Level C)
39
20 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week (Level C)
40
14 Gy in 4 fractions which may be repeated 2 further times every 4 weeks (Level C)
41
The types of evidence and the grading of recommendations used within this review are based on
those proposed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.
10
*Please note this recommendation was corrected on 2 December 2020 from 8 Gy in 3 fractions over three
weeks (Level C). It had been previously updated on 20 November 2020 from the original schedule which
incorrectly stated 21 Gy in 3 fractions over 3 weeks (Level C).
45Radiotherapy dose fractionation Third edition
Re-irradiation
Re-irradiation with curative intent can be an option for selected patients with limited local
recurrence or new primary disease who are unsuitable for surgical treatment/decline
surgery. Re-irradiation may also be considered following salvage surgery with adverse
histological features (for example, positive margins, extracapsular spread). Patient
selection, choice of dose fractionation and dose constraints are individualised dependent
on the extent of recurrence, time from previous radiotherapy, sequalae of prior treatment,
proximity to organs at risk, performance status, co-morbidity and nutritional status.
Radiotherapy target volumes are limited to high-risk areas only and do not include elective
regions. Ideally the aim should be to deliver a dose equivalent of ≥60 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction,
although the dose may need to be reduced on an individual basis if organ at risk tolerances
are exceeded.
40,41
Hyperfractionation with bi-daily irradiation at approximately 1.2 Gy per
fraction can be considered (Grade C).
10,41
The use of concomitant radiosensitising agents
should only be used with extreme caution.
46Radiotherapy dose fractionation Third edition
1. Ho KF, Fowler JF, Sykes AJ, Yap BK, Lee LW, Slevin NJ. IMRT dose fractionation for head and neck
cancer: variation in current approaches will make standardisation dicult. Acta Oncol 2009; 48(3):
431–439.
2. Le QT, Fu KK, Kroll S et al. Inuence of fraction size, total dose, and overall time on local control of T1-T2
glottic carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39(1): 115–126.
3. Yamazaki H, Nishiyama K, Tanaka E, Koizumi M, Chatani M. Radiotherapy for early glottic carcinoma
(T1N0M0): results of prospective randomized study of radiation fraction size and overall treatment
time. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64(1): 77–82.
4. Chera BS, Amdur RJ, Morris CG, Kirwan JM, Mendenhall WM. T1N0 to T2N0 squamous cell carcinoma
of the glottic larynx treated with denitive radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 78(2):
461–466.
5. Gowda RV, Henk JM, Mais KL, Sykes AJ, Swindell R, Slevin NJ. Three weeks radiotherapy for T1 glottic
cancer: the Christie and Royal Marsden Hospital Experience. Radiother Oncol 2003; 68(2): 105–111.
6. Cheah NL, Lupton S, Marshall A, et al. Outcome of T1N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx
treated with short-course radiotherapy to a total dose of 50 Gy in 16 fractions: the Birmingham
experience. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2009; 21(6): 494–501.
7. Ermis E, Teo M, Dyker KE, Fosker C, Sen M, Prestwich RJ. Denitive hypofractionated radiotherapy for
early glottic carcinoma: experience of 55 Gy in 20 fractions. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10: 203.
8. Short S, Krawitz H, Macann A et al. TN/TN glottic carcinoma: a comparison of two fractionation
schedules. Australas Radiol 2006; 50(2): 152–157.
9. Trotti A 3rd, Zhang Q, Bentzen SM et al. Randomized trial of hyperfractionation versus conventional
fractionation in T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the vocal cord (RTOG 9512). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol
Phys 2014; 89(5): 958–963.
10. www.cebm.net/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009
(last accessed 26/9/16)
11. Bourhis J, Overgaard J, Audry H et al. Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck
cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006; 368(9538): 843–854.
12. Overgaard J, Hansen HS, Specht L et al. Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional
radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6 and 7 randomised
controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 362(9388): 933–940.
13. Pettit L, Hartley A, Bowden SJ et al. Variation in volume denition between UK head and neck
oncologists treating oropharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2011; 23(9): 654–655.
14. Sher DJ, Balboni TA, Haddad RI et al. Ecacy and toxicity of chemoradiotherapy using intensity-
modulated radiotherapy for unknown primary of head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;
80(5): 1405–1411.
15. Chen AM, Farwell DG, Lau DH, Li BQ, Luu Q, Donald PJ. Radiation therapy in the management of
head-and-neck cancer of unknown primary origin: how does the addition of concurrent chemotherapy
aect the therapeutic ratio? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81(2): 346–352.
16. Frank SJ, Rosenthal DI, Petsuksiri J et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical node squamous
cell carcinoma metastases from unknown head-and-neck primary site: M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
outcomes and patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 78(4): 1005–1010.
References
47Radiotherapy dose fractionation Third edition
17. Shoushtari A, Saylor D, Kerr KL et al. Outcomes of patients with head-and-neck cancer of unknown
primary origin treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81(3):
e83–e91.
18. Bedi M, Firat S, Semenenko VA et al. Elective lymph node irradiation with intensity-modulated
radiotherapy: is conventional dose fractionation necessary? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 83(1):
e87–e92.
19. Eisbruch A, Harris J, Garden AS et al. Multi-institutional trial of accelerated hypofractionated intensity-
modulated radiation therapy for early-stage oropharyngeal cancer (RTOG 00-22). Int J Radiat Oncol
Biol Phys 2010; 76(5): 1333–1338.
20. Pignon JP, le Maitre A, Maillard E, Bourhis J, MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-analysis of
chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346
patients. Radiother Oncol 2009; 92(1): 4–14.
21. Nutting CM, Morden JP, Harrington KJ et al. Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional
radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Lancet Oncol 2011;12(2): 127–136.
22. Nguyen-Tan PF, Zhang Q, Ang KK et al. Randomized phase III trial to test accelerated versus standard
fractionation in combination with concurrent cisplatin for head and neck carcinomas in the Radiation
Therapy Oncology Group 0129 trial: long-term report of ecacy and toxicity. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32(34):
3858–3866.
23. Bourhis J, Sire C, Gra P et al. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus acceleration of radiotherapy
with or without concomitant chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (GORTEC
99-02): an open-label phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13(2): 145–153.
24. Meade S, Sanghera P, McConkey C et al. Revising the radiobiological model of synchronous
chemotherapy in head-and-neck cancer: a new analysis examining reduced weighting of accelerated
repopulation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 86(1): 157–163.
25. Benghiat H, Sanghera P, Cashmore J et al. Four week hypofractionated accelerated intensity
modulated radiotherapy and synchronous carboplatin or cetuximab in biologically staged
oropharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer and Clinical Oncology 2014; 3(2): 2.
26. Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal
cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 363(1): 24–35.
27. Beitler JJ, Zhang Q, Fu KK et al. Final results of local-regional control and late toxicity of RTOG 9003:
a randomized trial of altered fractionation radiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Int J
Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 89(1): 13–20.
28. Peters LJ, Goepfert H, Ang KK et al. Evaluation of the dose for postoperative radiation therapy of head
and neck cancer: rst report of a prospective randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993; 26(1):
3–11.
29. Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA et al. Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for
high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2004; 350(19): 1937–1944.
30. Bernier J, Domenge C, Ozsahin M et al. Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant
chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350(19): 1945–1952.
31. Bernier J, Cooper JS, Pajak TF et al. Dening risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a
comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC
(#22931) and RTOG (# 9501). Head Neck 2005; 27(10): 843–850.
References
48Radiotherapy dose fractionation Third edition
32. Langendijk JA, Ferlito A, Takes RP et al. Postoperative strategies after primary surgery for squamous
cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncol 2010; 46(8): 577–585.
33. Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology-Head and Neck, Salama JK, Saba N et al. ACR appropriateness
criteria® adjuvant therapy for resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncol
2011; 47(7): 554–559.
34. Lee AW, Lin JC, Ng WT. Current management of nasopharyngeal cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2012;
22(3): 233–244.
35. Lee N, Harris J, Garden AS et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy
for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: radiation therapy oncology group phase II trial 0225. J Clin Oncol 2009;
27(22): 3684–3690.
36. Boon CS, Hartley A, Sanghera P. Initial ecacy of hypofractionated accelerated chemo-tomotherapy(r)
for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2015; 27(8): 484–485.
37. Shahid Iqbal M, Kelly C, Kovarik J et al. Palliative radiotherapy for locally advanced non-metastatic head
and neck cancer: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2018; 126: 558–567.
38. Kancherla KN, Oksuz DC, Prestwich RJ et al. The role of split-course hypofractionated palliative
radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2011; 23(2): 141–148.
39. Nguyen NT, Doerwald-Munoz L, Zhang H et al. 0-7-21 hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy: an
eective treatment for advanced head and neck cancers. Br J Radiol 2015; 88(1049): 20140646.
40. Mohanti BK, Umapathy H, Bahadur S, Thakar A, Pathy S. Short course palliative radiotherapy of 20 Gy
in 5 fractions for advanced and incurable head and neck cancer: AIIMS study. Radiother Oncol 2004;
71(3): 275–280.
41. Corry J, Peters LJ, Costa ID et al. The ‘QUAD SHOT’ – a phase II study of palliative radiotherapy for
incurable head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2005; 77(2): 137–142.
42. Strojan P, Corry J, Eisbruch A et al. Recurrent and second primary squamous cell carcinoma of the
head and neck: when and how to reirradiate. Head Neck 2015; 37(1): 134–150.
43. McDonald MW, Lawson J, Garg MK et al. ACR appropriateness criteria retreatment of recurrent head
and neck cancer after prior denitive radiation expert panel on radiation oncology-head and neck
cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 80(5): 1292–1298.